|
|
 |
The Kuklos Papers, Fitzwater Wray (1927)
J M Dent Sexto 192pp
Collected pieces of journalism written between 1908 and 1927 by
one of the most important cycling writers of his time
|
Kuklos was the pen name of W Fitzwater Wray, who contributed a weekly
'Cycling Notes' column to London's Daily News newspaper from the opening
years of the twentieth century until the paper's closure in 1930.
Collected in this volume are 21 pieces varying in length from 1,500
to 6,000 words - most are reworked newspaper columns, four were written
specially for this book.
The pieces are quite unlike anything appearing in national newspapers
today - although they have some common features with other newspaper columnists
of the pre-television era. The column that George Orwell wrote in Tribune
from 1943 bears some similarity to Kuklos' style, for example.
Each takes as its starting point experiences from the writer's life,
rather than the 'newsworthy' events. In this collection then, is a piece
on the moral quality of different winds, and a celebration of a stop in
the Cotswolds enforced by a puncture and the difficulties of cycling at
night with a blackout in force. He has a fine descriptive flourish and
deep stock of poems from which he quotes. Most important, though is his
fascination with the nature of cycling experience. The light he shines
on our shared enjoyment is as fresh today as when it was written.
It is worth seeking out as an entertainment - his style is engaging
and he has an enriching stock of cultural references. The penultimate
piece, however, has some potential importance in the development of the
idea of cycling.
'Of Wriggling' starts as a
rebuke to John Ruskin, who was apparently not keen on cyclists nor their
machines. The thrust of Wray's argument is that there is an intrinsic
goodness and value in cycling - indeed he sets out 39 numbered reasons
why cycling will endure and increase in importance to humanity. To get
to this point he traces the history of cycling up to the mid-1920s. In
this well-known trajectory, cycling was initially a craze among the athletic,
wealthy men, before becoming something more like a mass movement during
the 1890s.
Cars, the First World War, and ossifying bicycle designs had significantly
diffused cycling's modishness by the mid 1920s. Wray notes that the Cyclists
Touring Club's membership peaked at over 60,000 in 1899. "The first
decade of the twentieth century saw the bicycle selling in huge quantities,
but almost exclusively as a vehicle of utilitarian necessity...the CTC
lost 40,000 members in ten years". By 1918, CTC membership stood
at 8,500, but by 1927 was back up to 25,000 (in 2010 the CTC exceeded
its Victorian high water mark for the first time).
Wray's identification of an enduring, perhaps eternal, value in the
bicycle is an important early statement of this idea. Indeed, his case
is no less persuasive nearly 90 years after it was written. The importance
of this work, however, is that as early at 1927 the sense that cycling
was an exceptional product industrialisation was already burning bright.
This is a notion although rarely articulated - is the unsaid belief
that binds together the freemasonary of cyclists. Wray's early identification
of this is sufficient to place him in the Parthenon of important cycling
writers - happily he provides much else beside to amuse and enlighten.
TD Sep 10
There are some biographical notes about Fitzwater Wray here.
|
Bookmark this on Delicious
Follow the site!
Join our list we will let you known when new reviews
are added to the site. We will never share your email address with
third parties.
tim@timdawsn.demon.co.uk
You can also follow us on Facebook
|
Visit our sister site
for dispassionate, expert advice on general cycling
issues
|
How this site is organised
As reviews are added, they are featured on the
front page. All titles are listed in the master index and cross-referenced
in the other indicies.
The subject line contains the title, author and
date of each book's publication. As a general rule, we list the
date of the actual edition that we read, unless there is an obvious
reason to use the original date (say where we read a reprint).
The first line of the main text contains the name
of the publisher, the ISBN
number, where it exists, an indication of the book's
size and the number of printed pages that it contains. Finally,
where it is clear, I list the published price of the work in the
currency that is most prominently displayed.
We summarise the book in a single sentence or two
in the next line. The rest of the review is then intended as a self-contained
piece.
|
|