|
|
 | Roule
Britannia, William Fotheringham (2005)Yellow Jersey Press 0 224 074253
290pp Octo £15.99
A highly readable history of British participation in the Tour
de France 1955 2004

|
It is a curious thing being a British cycling fan. Bicycle sport cant
be claimed as an underground interest any longer Channel Four used
to attract audiences of 5 million in the hey day of their tour coverage,
and London could scarcely have made a greater spectacle of hosting the
Tours depart in 2007. But, because there are sports that are so,
so much bigger - sports that are woven thick through the national tapestry-
there is still something of the outsider about us bikies.
Only
our perception of our marginal place in the countrys grand scheme can have
made heroes out of the nations rosta of professional bicycle racers. Taken
together and subjected to objective scrutiny, they do not amount to a hill of
beans. In the entire history of the tour, as a nation, we have not produced a
single top three finish, have only one won a jersey of any kind (Robert Millars
1984 Mountains prize), and have won fewer stages than countries with one
tenth of our population.
And yet, I for one, have hung on the performance of every British tour
rider, at least since Barry Hoban. I have willed Robert Millar out of
the pack; saluted Sean Yates' sturdy performance of duty; thrilled to
Chris Boardmans electrifying prologues, and; spent five hours in
a baking sun just to watch Max Sciandri pluck defeat from the jaws of
victory. It has been a meagre diet of sucess. But, perhaps as studies
of the health those brought up on WW2 rations have shown, thin pickings
can be the most nutritionally beneficial.
William
Fotheringhams account of this history is masterful and frequently touching.
Even where riders have been the subject of quality biographies say like
Millar - he finds new angles. He may not touch Jeff Connors account of the
ANC/Halfords 1987 debacle for laughs but he provides enough make a good
case for seeking out Wide Eyed and Legless. And in the case of David Millar, the
rider with whom Fotheringhams book closes, he has done the best job of explaining
his troubled persona that I have yet read.Roule Britannia is actually
at its most affecting when Fotheringham touches on his own cycling back story.
It is used to provide only the most occasional linking fibre to the narrative,
but I would happily have read a whole lot more.
Of course this is a story that has now moved on. In the 2008 Tour Mark
Cavendish served up four stage victories as much to digest in one
race as British fans had to contend with in the preceding decade. And,
Team GBs cycling Golds at the Beijing Olympics provided a further
eight-course feast of success. So much triumphal fois gras after a century
of gruel may prove a challenge to our constitutions. But, hey, who can
blame someone who has walked through the desert for gorging themselves
now that they have reached the waterhole?
PS February 09
|
Bookmark this on Delicious
Follow the site!
Join our list we will let you known when new reviews
are added to the site. We will never share your email address with
third parties.
tim@timdawsn.demon.co.uk
You can also follow us on Facebook
|
Visit our sister site
for dispassionate, expert advice on general cycling
issues
|
How this site is organised
As reviews are added, they are featured on the
front page. All titles are listed in the master index and cross-referenced
in the other indicies.
The subject line contains the title, author and
date of each book's publication. As a general rule, we list the
date of the actual edition that we read, unless there is an obvious
reason to use the original date (say where we read a reprint).
The first line of the main text contains the name
of the publisher, the ISBN
number, where it exists, an indication of the book's
size and the number of printed pages that it contains. Finally,
where it is clear, I list the published price of the work in the
currency that is most prominently displayed.
We summarise the book in a single sentence or two
in the next line. The rest of the review is then intended as a self-contained
piece.
|
|