|
|
 |
Raleigh, Tony Hadland (2011)
Cycle Publishing/Van Der Plas Publications 9781892495685 $49
An excellent one-volume history of the company that had a reasonable
claim to having been the world's biggest and best cycle manufacturer

|
Company histories do not have much of a reputation. Even when professional
historians are given free reign with the corporate archives, it is rare
that they extract more than a turgid timeline of managers, meetings and
mergers. Hadland's Raleigh is different for any number of reasons.
It is in no sense official. Its author has written enjoyably and definitively
on much of the rest of the British cycle industry. And, the production
is up to Van Der Plas recent, exceptionally high, standards. There are
colour illustrations on nearly every page and a positive wealth of archival
material reproduced, including lots of delicious period advertisements,
such as that on the cover.
Raleigh's is an extraordinary story. Like dozens, if not hundreds of
other tiny British manufacturers, it started life in a back-street workshop
in the 1880s. Unusually, it was taken over by Frank Bowden, who turned
out to be a visionary industrialist who by 1891 was employing 200 people.
By 1908 the company was making 32,000 bicycles a year.
During the twentieth century some of its competitors - Sunbeam and Rover
- diverted their attention to motor manufacturing. Many, many others,
Rudge, Carlton, BSA and Triumph to name just a few - merged with, or were
taken over by the Nottingham firm. It somehow navigated the dramatic decline
of utility cycling at the end of the 1950s, and by the 1970s completely
dominated British cycle manufacture and was considered by many foreigners
to be the greatest cycle manufacturer in the world.
This extraordinary corporate adventure is relayed both in narrative
form, and via interviews with workers, managers and customers of the company.
Hadland ranges widely other Raleigh's foreign operations, buildings, industrial
relations, broader cultural references - such as Saturday Night Sunday
Morning - and much, much more. Several chapters are contributed by other
acclaimed experts in their fields - such as Scotford Lawrence's entry
on the company's advertising materials.
It is a fabulous book that delivers, both as an end-to-end read and
as a trove into which to dip. There are worthwhile questions, however,
that it leaves unanswered.
To grow and sustain such an industrial edifice was a spectacular achievement
- but was it the genius of the Bowden's and their staff - or that many
others gave up on bikes? Raleigh achieved a commanding position in the
UK - and yet, from the 1970s onwards, the company appeared flat footed.
They mucked up the Moulton, rejected the Brompton, largely missed BMX
and were very late to mountain bikes. Never in my lifetime were they considered
cool. Even owners of their very best bikes - like the Romany - usually
had to explain that the special products division really did make good
bikes.
Despite all this, Raleighs were manufacturing in the UK until 2002 and
'at the time of writing, the business still exists' as Hadland notes.
Still designed and marketed in Nottinghamshire, they are 'as British as
Dyson, Robers or Hornby', he says.
Perhaps such a book is not the place to consider such contextual questions.
Indeed, the appearance existence of such an excellent work should perhaps
now be the prompt for others to take up those more conundrums.
PS Dec 11
|
Bookmark this on Delicious
Follow the site!
Join our list we will let you known when new reviews
are added to the site. We will never share your email address with
third parties.
tim@timdawsn.demon.co.uk
You can also follow us on Facebook
|
Visit our sister site
for dispassionate, expert advice on general cycling
issues
|
How this site is organised
As reviews are added, they are featured on the
front page. All titles are listed in the master index and cross-referenced
in the other indicies.
The subject line contains the title, author and
date of each book's publication. As a general rule, we list the
date of the actual edition that we read, unless there is an obvious
reason to use the original date (say where we read a reprint).
The first line of the main text contains the name
of the publisher, the ISBN
number, where it exists, an indication of the book's
size and the number of printed pages that it contains. Finally,
where it is clear, I list the published price of the work in the
currency that is most prominently displayed.
We summarise the book in a single sentence or two
in the next line. The rest of the review is then intended as a self-contained
piece.
|
|